Hardware Today: Vendors Sharpen Server Blade Offerings to Stay a Cut Above

by Ben Freeman

The server blade market is growing by leaps and bounds. We look at the leading players as well as what to consider when choosing a vendor.

There's no denying server blades are on the fast track. Blade sales topped $583 million in 2003, according to the latest edition of IDC's Quarterly Server Tracker. While this represents a small piece of the $13.7 billion 2003 server pie, it is a huge leap from 2002's $90 million in blade sales.

At their most simple, blades are thin servers that cram stackable computing power into a low power, heat-optimized sheath-like chassis. Ever since RLX unleashed the first blades on the market in May 2001, heat control and space savings has been the segment's main selling point.

The blades market underwent a tremendous growth spurt in 2003 that left the leading players jockeying for the top spots: After nearly two years of controlling the market, HP was elbowed down to second, and Big Blue came in first in terms of both units shipped and revenue. IBM, which had slightly more than one year of air time in the blade market, credited its success to the fact that it was able to leverage its mainframe background into the slim 2-way and 4-way Xeon blades.

Later this week, IBM will introduce a new BladeCenter-T design ruggedized for military and space travel type applications. The BladeCenter-T will be tailored to the telecom industry's Network Equipment Building System 3 (NEBS 3) requirements, and it reinforces IBM's push toward the high end. "These systems have been hardened to withstand high temperature, violent shaking, lightning strikes, airborne contaminants, fires, and electrostatic discharge," IBM spokesperson Chris Rubsamen told ServerWatch.

But blade vendors need not limit themselves to the high end, as evidenced by the strategy of vendors currently offering Pentium III processors. "No one's trying to be everything to everybody, which makes sense," Gartner Research Director Jane Wright told ServerWatch. Wright says vendors offering Pentium III or Pentium Mobile blades aim primarily for edge or high-performance computing environments (i.e., segments where distributing the workload to many not-so-powerful servers quickly is of value), whereas those vendors that add the latest and greatest Xeon servers to their fold are aiming at the high-end, mission-critical market.

HP's Adaptive Enterprise covers both bases with an eye on blade ubiquity. "HP sees blades as systems, not servers, existing within a larger context, persisting beyond a single generation of technology," said Anthony Dina, manager of business development for blades in HP's Industry Standard Servers group. "They're designed to help in every role where computation work needs to get done, desktop and server alike," Dina added. HP's ProLiant p-Class aims at the high end, with 2-way and 4-way Xeon blades in the stable, and an Opteron server in the pipeline. HP's e-Class is targeted at low-end edge apps.

Dell, on the other hand, sees its sweet spot at the low end. Despite a lack of emphasis on its blades, there was no keeping the Poweredge 1655 MC from the mainstream. Based on both IDC's and Gartner's accounting, Dell's blades took third place (albeit a very distant third place) in revenue. "We continue to closely evaluate the server blade market and gauge readiness for a second-generation server blade," a Dell spokesperson said. The Dell spokesperson with whom we spoke declined to be interviewed in depth, and provided no road map details. He concurred, however, with IDC's view that "2004 will be the beginning of a trend toward more significant blade adoption by customers."

Although neither RLX nor Egenera matches Dell in sales, both vendors have significant roles in the space, not the least of which is their first to market positions. The vendors have a year-plus head start over HP in blade development as well as blade-centric management software that each believes gives it a leg up. The blade market is currently one of the few hardware niches where innovative, smaller vendors can take a crack against market consolidation.

Even the research firms are taking notice of this. "We're really excited at Gartner because we haven't seen this in ages," Wright told ServerWatch, "[In other segments] All we see is vendors going away, merging, and being eaten up, and it gets a little depressing." Wright cites the exciting possibility that "someone like an Egenera or an RLX can consider being a major player here."

Like HP, RLX covers both the high end and the low end (after a start focusing on the low end); Egenera targets financial and other vertical markets with high-end offerings similar to IBM's. Down the road, it's not a far stretch to imagine market synergy resulting in IBM making a play for Egenera or HP making a play for RLX.

The following chart breaks out the offerings from the top blade vendors, in terms of revenue and mind share.

Server Blade Options

Max No.
of Blades per
Form Factor
Blade Models
Vendor Perks
IBMBladeCenter14 per 7UHS20,
32-bit Xeon (HS line), 64-bit Power 970 (JS)High-end, mission-critical deploymentsPower 64-bit option; IBM's mainframe experience and engineering budget; tightly partnered with Intel toward hardware standardization
HPProLiant BL e20 per 3UBL 10e G2Pentium MLow-end edge, high-performance computing appsVaried, high-/low-end approach; manageability and ubiquity focus; desktop options; HP's budget and ability to juggle heterogeneous server lines
ProLiant BL p8 Xeon DP or 2 Xeon MP per 7U BL20p G2,
2 (20 series) or 4 (40 series) XeonHigh-performance computing apps
Dell1655MC6 per 3U1655MCTwo Pentium IIILow-end edge, high-performance apps"Dell simple," though Dell downplays blades' importance
EgeneraBladeFrame24 2-way or 4-way servers per enclosure
Cblade, Pblade, and SbladeCblades (Control Blades) and Sblades (Switch Blades) are farmed-out networking and storage components. Pblades use 32-bit Xeon DP or MP. Each interoperates to make Egenera blades tick.High end, financial services in particular, with innovative Processing Area Network (PAN) manager software.Time in market; well-developed blade-specific PAN manager software; separate storage and network layers for a truly modular approach
BladeFrame ES6 2-way or 4-way servers per enclosureSame as BladeFrame, but more compact
RLX300ex24 1-way per 3U800i,
Low-voltage Pentium IIIHigh density blades for scale-outTime in market; number of models; variety of high- and low-end processor options; strong, blade-specific Control Tower management software
600ex10 2-way per 6U2600ie,
Single or dual Xeons of increasing power by model numberHigh performance

Despite the nascent state of the blade space, these aren't the only players. In mid-2003, when it last broke out blades, Gartner found that sales in the blade space mirrored the overall server market. Following Dell's distant third to IBM and HP, was SPARC contender and x86 dabbler Sun. Gartner attributes this to perennial SPARC demand and a confused x86 strategy that focused on both AMD Athlon Mobile and Intel chips. Gartner placed RLX sixth worldwide, and Egenera, although not listed, was considered seventh.

Egenera stands apart from the crowd in terms of design and manageability, virtualizing all aspects of its blade architecture with its own design solutions. "That means getting rid of things like onboard disks or physical NIC cards," says Susan Davis, Egenera vice president of marketing. "Those things give a server a fixed identity and make it a very static resource," she added, "so what we did was take those things off the server and transform them into software, so you can centrally manage them."

While it is accepted as an almost universal truth that management software differentiates one blade offering from another, another more basic differentiator for individual blades is coming back into play: heat and power.

Gartner has determined with certainty that blades in general offer a value proposition in terms of heat output and power used compared to traditional rack-mount counterparts. It also found results vary by vendor. Although Wright would not provide specifics, she said that an upcoming report will reveal which vendors have mastered the heat output/power usage equation better than others.

This article was originally published on Tuesday Mar 16th 2004
Mobile Site | Full Site